USC Cancels Valedictorian's Speech Over Bogus 'Safety Concerns'

This week, the University of Southern California (USC) announced that the college's valedictorian, Asna Tabassum, would be barred from speaking at commencement. The school cited concerns that Tabassum, who had recently come under fire for an anti-Israel social media post, would create safety concerns.

Advertisement

USC announced that Tabassum had been selected as the school's valedictorian on April 4, after choosing her from among over 100 students with a GPA of 3.9 or higher.

But less than two weeks later, the school announced that Tabassum would not be allowed to speak at commencement, following complaints from several USC student groups over Tabassum's social media postings. Namely, many cited a link in Tabassum's Instagram bio that calls Zionism a "racist settler-colonial ideology that advocates for a jewish ethnostate built on palestinian land" and calls for "the complete abolishment of the state of israel."

Ed Morrissey

This is a strange episode. It's not as if USC is a bastion of conservative activism. It's also not been among the schools that have had splashy anti-Semitic demonstrations. Crosstown rival UCLA has a worse reputation for that. So why restrain Tabassum's speech, even if she says provocative or even hateful things?

"Safety" is a bad excuse for censorship, no matter which direction it gets applied. If Tabassum makes stupid and bigoted remarks, let the crowd rebuke her for it; opponents can hold a demonstration to rebuke her, as long as it is not disruptive and is otherwise lawful. The best remedy for bad speech is more speech, not more "safety."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement